Bristol Site

RowenaBCAMC replied on 02/07/2020 16:53

Posted on 02/07/2020 16:53

Hi everyone, 

We wanted to keep you updated of the Club’s plan for a new site in Bristol. The Club bought a site in Clanage Road in 2016 as a replacement for the extremely popular Baltic Wharf campsite because the Club’s landlord, Bristol City Council, had been moving ahead with plans to redevelop the Western Harbour area of Bristol.

We would really like to be able to continue to offer a site in Bristol as we know many of our members love to visit Bristol and have fond memories of staying at Baltic Wharf. It will also have a great economic benefit in the local area with members visiting local attractions, shopping and eating out, as the City is easily accessible on foot and by public transport from the new proposed site. Having a Club Site will also extend the range of accommodation Bristol can offer.

We have resubmitted a planning application for a site on Clanage Road and would love it if any members can help this application by contacting Bristol City Council in support of the proposed new Club Site. 

For more information on how to support a planning application visit: https://www.bristol.gov.uk/planning-and-building-regulations/comment-on-a-planning-application or alternatively you can email the Council your thoughts: development.management@bristol.gov.uk

We would be very grateful for your support in this matter and thank you in advance for your help. Support from members could well help to secure a positive outcome. In the meantime members will still be able to stay at Baltic Wharf Club Site in Bristol up until the end of the year. 

We will keep you posted on developments and wish you a very happy touring season ahead.

JVB66 replied on 03/07/2020 15:00

Posted on 03/07/2020 15:00

According to the local paper numerous roads in Bristol including Clanage road where the proposed site would be has got somewhere on its length a 20mph limit which is being reviewedsurprised

Wherenext replied on 03/07/2020 15:16

Posted on 03/07/2020 14:40 by Metheven

From my understanding it is not in the red Zone, nor the Clean Air zone, and privately owned diesels are not charged for entering the Clean Air zone which gives more access/exit  routes from the East and South other than the main access/exit route from the Gordano turn off....... unless they change it again.

Posted on 03/07/2020 15:16

Ta for that. I wuz wondering.

Compo replied on 03/07/2020 15:54

Posted on 03/07/2020 15:54

Content has been removed.

Compo replied on 03/07/2020 16:36

Posted on 03/07/2020 16:36

Content has been removed.

peedee replied on 03/07/2020 16:45

Posted on 03/07/2020 14:36 by

Hope my calculations are wrong!

They are! No idea of the distances you are using (around 240 metres?) but at 40 instead of 30 it will take 3 quarters of the time. 

As an ex highway engineer:

For a junction onto a 30mph limit the required visibility distance is 43m (y distance) from a point 2.4m behind the edge of carriageway measured down the access. This will define the needed visibility splay etc. Double white line systems make splays less onerous to the left on exit. At 40mph the y distance is 120m.

 

https://documents.hants.gov.uk/highways/TG3TechnicalGuidanceNote-StoppingSightDistancesandVisibilitySplays.pdf

Posted on 03/07/2020 16:45

Many thanks ET, I was hoping you would come on to shed so professional light on the matter. From what you say it is difficult to see what the Transport Development body is complaining about. The distances quoted in the Club's submission are 120m to the left and 142m to the right.

peedee

brue replied on 03/07/2020 20:19

Posted on 03/07/2020 20:19

The site is next to the Bedminster Cricket ground which is also used for over flow parking when there's a football match on at the nearby stadium. There will be times when access to the site is impinged, eg local roads closed for the Balloon Fiesta etc apart from that it's a typical city area with a steady flow of traffic during the day but quieter at night.

DavidKlyne replied on 03/07/2020 21:38

Posted on 03/07/2020 21:38

To me many of the documents by officials objecting to the campsite are somewhat spurious. They mention tidal flooding which is a one in 200 year event! They mention increased traffic although the events mentioned by Brue above far outnumber any increase from the building of the campsite. The Senior Conservation Architect mentions the visual harm the site would cause. No house owner will be impacted as there are none. Mention is made of the impact on the Clifton area and the Suspension Bridge of a site " Will be affected by the clutter of caravans" What he fails to mention is that where it might be visible you would need a powerful pair of binoculars to see that clutter. It seems to me that the Council don't actually want a campsite anywhere near the City!!! Perhaps the Club need a decent Planning Consultant who would challenge the objections?

David

peedee replied on 03/07/2020 23:38

Posted on 03/07/2020 23:38

Entirely agree David which is why I called them jobsworths. The only one that made some sense was the Transport Delveloment Management but even that could be challenged.

peedee

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook