Bristol Site

RowenaBCAMC replied on 02/07/2020 16:53

Posted on 02/07/2020 16:53

Hi everyone, 

We wanted to keep you updated of the Club’s plan for a new site in Bristol. The Club bought a site in Clanage Road in 2016 as a replacement for the extremely popular Baltic Wharf campsite because the Club’s landlord, Bristol City Council, had been moving ahead with plans to redevelop the Western Harbour area of Bristol.

We would really like to be able to continue to offer a site in Bristol as we know many of our members love to visit Bristol and have fond memories of staying at Baltic Wharf. It will also have a great economic benefit in the local area with members visiting local attractions, shopping and eating out, as the City is easily accessible on foot and by public transport from the new proposed site. Having a Club Site will also extend the range of accommodation Bristol can offer.

We have resubmitted a planning application for a site on Clanage Road and would love it if any members can help this application by contacting Bristol City Council in support of the proposed new Club Site. 

For more information on how to support a planning application visit: https://www.bristol.gov.uk/planning-and-building-regulations/comment-on-a-planning-application or alternatively you can email the Council your thoughts: development.management@bristol.gov.uk

We would be very grateful for your support in this matter and thank you in advance for your help. Support from members could well help to secure a positive outcome. In the meantime members will still be able to stay at Baltic Wharf Club Site in Bristol up until the end of the year. 

We will keep you posted on developments and wish you a very happy touring season ahead.

SeasideBill replied on 03/07/2020 12:03

Posted on 03/07/2020 11:48 by eurortraveller

In my travels I have seen Aires in city centres - with no resident staff, automated entry with a bank card and that way for power and water too, but no other facilities.  

Then there are Campsites at city outskirts - with multi lingual receptionists, tourist information desks, bike hire, coffee and pastries at breakfast,  and public transport at the gate.

The proposal for Bristol seems to be neither one or the other, but just an ill judged attempt at compromise. 

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:03

I think the proposed site would best suit the former, but it would be a bold move for the Club to take. If it preserves a facility within the city, it’s much better than nothing. However, fully automated sites can be problematic if the technology has a bad day and they seem to turn some folks brains to mush.

 

SteveL replied on 03/07/2020 12:03

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:03

I think the concept good. If used as Baltic Wharf, the site itself is not the destination, just somewhere to park your caravan or Motorhome to visit the town and surrounding area. 

Its position whilst convient for the city is clearly not as good as BW. Where you can just go through the gate and sit on the harbour side with a pint. Buses do run reasonably frequently along Clanage road and go to the centre and bus station. For access to Ashton Court it is much better. My main reservation would be walking back to the site in the darker months. We often did this at BW rather than catch the bus or ferry but I wouldn't feel particularly safe in the area under the bridge / flyover.

replied on 03/07/2020 12:04

Posted on 03/07/2020 11:58 by MikeyA

Then there are Campsites at city outskirts - with multi lingual receptionists, tourist information desks, bike hire, coffee and pastries at breakfast, and public transport at the gate.

Not sure about the coffee and pastries ( can't remember) but all the rest (and lots of greenery) can be found at the Nantes site.

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:04

Not sure about the coffee and pastries ( can't remember) but all the rest (and lots of greenery) can be found at the Nantes site.

Not terribly convenient to Bristol though

SteveL replied on 03/07/2020 12:13

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:13

The proposal for Bristol seems to be neither one or the other, but just an ill judged attempt at compromise.

It is a similar concept to BW which is very, very, popular. I think the new site if it gets through planning is likely to be the same. I'm not sure that is ill judged.

brue replied on 03/07/2020 12:14

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:14

The unused railway line at the back of the site is earmarked for a re-connection to Portishead on the coast. I think there is a station planned at Pill, further along the Avon. I presume there will be other stops and maybe easy city access and no doubt eco friendly? The big drawback is going to be the ban on diesel vehicles. I support the site plan but I think this is going to be a difficult application. I don't want my personal details in the comments section (our local planning is the same but locally we all know each other anyway.) So because I'm a contributor to CT I can only back the application on here to keep my other details reasonably private.

SteveL replied on 03/07/2020 12:27

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:27

It would be interesting to know how often the site has flooded, as I believe that was one reason for rejecting it last time. I suppose a flooding event is a bit more difficult to predict than at York or Tewkesbury, where the flood pulses can be tracked as they move down stream. At Bristol it is both a function of river levels and very high spring tides, the combined levels of which are perhaps more difficult to predict. You don't really want to be evacuating every 12 hours.

peedee replied on 03/07/2020 12:27

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:13 by SteveL

The proposal for Bristol seems to be neither one or the other, but just an ill judged attempt at compromise.

It is a similar concept to BW which is very, very, popular. I think the new site if it gets through planning is likely to be the same. I'm not sure that is ill judged.

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:27

It is better than BW, it has a MSP.smile

peedee

brue replied on 03/07/2020 12:34

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:27 by SteveL

It would be interesting to know how often the site has flooded, as I believe that was one reason for rejecting it last time. I suppose a flooding event is a bit more difficult to predict than at York or Tewkesbury, where the flood pulses can be tracked as they move down stream. At Bristol it is both a function of river levels and very high spring tides, the combined levels of which are perhaps more difficult to predict. You don't really want to be evacuating every 12 hours.

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:34

I suppose you could ask the same about BW, both have the tidal  Avon alongside. 

replied on 03/07/2020 12:42

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:34 by brue

I suppose you could ask the same about BW, both have the tidal  Avon alongside. 

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:42

Baltic Wharf as been there a long time and maybe flooding was not such an high profile concern at the time. No idea if BW has flooded in the past

SeasideBill replied on 03/07/2020 12:42

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:34 by brue

I suppose you could ask the same about BW, both have the tidal  Avon alongside. 

Posted on 03/07/2020 12:42

Yes, more-or-less the same risk. I crossed the Cumberland Basin most days from 1997 to 2010 and don’t recall anything other than fairly minor localised flooding on exceptional spring tides which are obviously predictable.

 

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook