New Site Booking System

.....as for the difference 

1 ) I dont need to pay a deposit 

2) I can amend the booking up to 24hrs before

3) I can change my mind while on site and move on earlier or later to a different club site

4) I can leave early and get a refund

5) I can choose my pitch on arrival

Based on my experience of pitches filling up as soon as they become available I dont believe these changes will result in extra availability 

I am not a so called speculative booker, if there are any I don't believe they effect my ability to book.

You and TMTO miss the point. The unsubstantiated remark by TDA referred to the comment that many posters here were suspected of being speculative bookers. It was a slur on us.

"Though i suspect many of those posting, are part of the 25% speculative booking members of the club"

Your logic is flawed. The Club tells us 25% of bookings are cancelled. That doesn’t indicate the Club thinks they are speculative, merely that for a huge variety of reasons, 25% were cancelled. They don’t tell us how many of those 25% were rebooked, or moved to different dates. But you have chosen to make generalised comments about those who aren’t particularly in favour of the move over to deposits.🤷‍♀️

 As posted that figure was only posted when evidence was put forward to it seems make a case for the change when asked before the club would not  or more likely could not give a figure

As when the club were trying to make a case to reduce some retired and working staff concessions it was proved to be completely wrong as no records were kept to substantiate the figures

The Club will have the figures JV. No business as big or as professional as this wouldn’t know how each Site is performing. Every business uses figures to underpin a case for change. The Club has just chosen it’s moment very carefully. The problem is how some “lookers in” choose to interpret this information.

Not me I just posted facts 

Wasn't it this club that proferred those reasons for closing some non facility sites? That is, they knew how much "traffic" that each site generated. They'll know and if they don't know then they aren't fit for purpose. Every organisation should know what is happening below decks so to speak, well everyone except HMG obviously.

It was interesting to read what JK posted about how popular the Non-fac sites were. What a crying shame the folks at EG don't take any notice.

On the wrong track!

 I wish I had your confidence on how  EGH kept records, as i can assure you I have seen via some site staff how poor record keeping is is some areas

Two examples  of how EGH are on top of the finances they are? I will not mentions the seasonal site ,but we were visiting just after it opened, the site staff were wondering why the previous year the water bill for their site had almost quadrapulled ,,they thought they had a bad water leak,?so checked the meter which was a completely different reading ,only to find they had been billed for a full fat all year site Twenty miles away by EGH finance dept

Second example EGH had paid the bill for refuse pickups sent in error  by the refuse company to the site, and had been forwarded to EGH for payment even though the it was closed

I will let you off then