Would It Work ? – Open for sensible debate.

JohnM20 replied on 18/07/2017 16:50

Posted on 18/07/2017 16:50

With so many people complaining about the frenzied booking when the system opens in early December I thought I would try to suggest a solution for those not able to book so early due to work or other restrictions. Whilst I don’t fall foul of the system so much now, I have done in the past when works holiday dates could not be booked until well into the new year and especially when trying to include a weekend. 

Would it work if every site allowed only 50% of their pitches to be booked at any time from the December booking date with the remaining 50% not being bookable until no more than 2 months before the planned visit date?  Most people, I think, should be able to work around this for planned main holidays. This should accommodate those that must fully book their year in advance and those that cannot.

 I’m sure, (he says, tongue firmly in cheek), that the IT department could tweek the online booking program to accommodate this.

 Whether it is a workable solution I don’t know, it’s just a germ of an idea to solve what is a problem for many members but remains fair to all. There may be an obvious reason why it wouldn’t work that is staring me in the face but I haven’t seen it. I’m sure someone will point it out if there is one.

 Contrary to what some are against and reject out of hand, I think deposits would be a good idea. I cannot understand why some people are so against them unless they are seriously worried about losing them. The site fees have to be paid at some time so why not spread the cost?  There are many things in life that require a deposit, caravans and motorhomes being a good example.

 With the current system there must be some members who book very early but know that they may well change their mind closer to the date, although I doubt that any would admit to this. I personally know one couple who regularly cancel bookings, not necessarily at the last minute but nonetheless may have deprived someone else from being able to book and they have to consequently look for an alternative site. Non-refundable deposits would reduce this sort of behaviour I believe.

 I guess I will receive some flak but it would be nice to have a sensible debate.

GodivaNige replied on 20/07/2017 08:19

Posted on 20/07/2017 07:40 by

Most of those complaining about the present system say that they cannot book those sites that they want due to the sites being fully booked at weekend at certain times of the year. No matter which system booking honey pot sites at weekend will remain a lottery.

If booking is not permitted until a few months before the dates to be booked it might ease the process as for weekenders but not for folk, like me who insist on 'all the ducks in a row' site wise before going off for 6 weekss or so. It would mean my booking a tour of 8 or more sites piecemeal rather than all done and dusted in one session. Not something I would wish for and particularly doing so whilst away in the caravan as well.

Posted on 20/07/2017 08:19

There is a way around the problem as I have found.

Dont book with the CMC, join and book with the C&CC giving the option to book a lot further in advance if one wishes which better guarantees the chance of getting the sites in the areas you want to visit for the duration you want to book.

The two clubs operate different booking systems so there is the option available to all who prefer one against the other. I'm not one complaining about the way CMC do things, it just doesn't suit me, so my money will go to the other club.

As for the differing standards of the sites between CMC and the C&CC, in the past the two were chalk and cheese but in recent times, the C&CC have been investing wisely and have lifted their sites up to a much better standard. The brand new Derwentwater site is particularly lovely, have booked 4 weeks their at different times in 2018, including Christmas and New Year.

cyberyacht replied on 20/07/2017 09:25

Posted on 20/07/2017 09:25

ET has posited a scenario of 120 nights away entailing a deposit of £600 against an overall cost of getting on for three grand. Are we to suppose that anyone contemplating that amount of investment in site fees is unable to have sufficient wherewithal to fund deposits for such bookings. You are going to have to find it all in one go later in any case.

As I have posted before on numerous occasions, the retention of credit card details by the Club is all that is required to enable a penalty to be exacted from abusers of any system where deposits are not taken.

Cornersteady replied on 20/07/2017 09:57

Posted on 20/07/2017 09:25 by cyberyacht

ET has posited a scenario of 120 nights away entailing a deposit of £600 against an overall cost of getting on for three grand. Are we to suppose that anyone contemplating that amount of investment in site fees is unable to have sufficient wherewithal to fund deposits for such bookings. You are going to have to find it all in one go later in any case.

As I have posted before on numerous occasions, the retention of credit card details by the Club is all that is required to enable a penalty to be exacted from abusers of any system where deposits are not taken.

Posted on 20/07/2017 09:57

I think that ET and others like him are not the 'average' member who books club sites. yes there are many like him (lucky chaps and chappettes) but the club did publish the average number of nights book and number of bookings per year and they were much much lower?

Also that represents a booking deposit of 20%, is that what people want to pay for a deposit. My holiday abroad next week cost a lot more than £3000 but all they wanted was £100 deposit, yes I had to off the balance before a certain date but even so.

And yes while the whole amount has to be paid off, why should ET give up £600 to the club six months early or whatever rather than keep it in his own bank account (I know you’re an ex banker CY but still), when it has been shown that deposits lead to more no shows.

Maybe it's just me but I don't like the idea of giving the club, or anyone my card details to be kept open like this. I even don't like it in hotels and pubs where they swipe your card and keep it open till you leave/finished your meal.

Also can an organisation take money out of your account like this? Ok imagine I leave before paying at the hotel/pub, can they then really take money out without my final pin? I suppose they have my details and can get to me through them but to actually take money out? 

SteveL replied on 20/07/2017 10:03

Posted on 20/07/2017 10:03

Also can an organisation take money out of your account like this? Ok imagine I leave before paying at the hotel/pub, can they then really take money out without my final pin? I suppose they have my details and can get to me through them but to actually take money out?

 

I think normally they can. You will have agreed to it when accepting their T&C's when you booked or signed on arrival. I don't even think they need that 3 digit number on the back. Certainly when paying over the phone, I have been told, oh we don't need that. Then when the artical arrives there is a CC receipt with it headed, client not present. It was the reason in the good old days of manual machines for CC's you were advised to get hold of the carbons, particularly when abroad.

replied on 20/07/2017 10:09

Posted on 20/07/2017 10:09

There is a way around the problem as I have found.

Dont book with the CMC, join and book with the C&CC giving the option to book a lot further in advance if one wishes which better guarantees the chance of getting the sites in the areas you want to visit for the duration you want to book.

At present the CC system presents no problems for me to get around. In response to CY therre is not one lump aum to pay out. My holidays arein 4 parts. 3 tours and one long stay through the year.

GodivaNige replied on 20/07/2017 10:32

Posted on 20/07/2017 10:09 by

There is a way around the problem as I have found.

Dont book with the CMC, join and book with the C&CC giving the option to book a lot further in advance if one wishes which better guarantees the chance of getting the sites in the areas you want to visit for the duration you want to book.

At present the CC system presents no problems for me to get around. In response to CY therre is not one lump aum to pay out. My holidays arein 4 parts. 3 tours and one long stay through the year.

Posted on 20/07/2017 10:32

If the present system works for you that's great, I don't think they should change it because it will never suit everyone all of the time. Thats the thing about choice, it works for some and it doesn't work for others.

It doesn't suit me as much as it suits you, that's fine and it means the likes of me are better off with the alternatives available.

if the CC booking system changed to be more like the C&CC, then the choice would disappear leaving some happy, others disappointed. By having different systems offered by the two big clubs, customers can make an informed decision who they place their bookings with. Each have their advantages and disadvantages which members take into account when making their holiday plans.

DavidKlyne replied on 20/07/2017 15:16

Posted on 20/07/2017 10:32 by GodivaNige

If the present system works for you that's great, I don't think they should change it because it will never suit everyone all of the time. Thats the thing about choice, it works for some and it doesn't work for others.

It doesn't suit me as much as it suits you, that's fine and it means the likes of me are better off with the alternatives available.

if the CC booking system changed to be more like the C&CC, then the choice would disappear leaving some happy, others disappointed. By having different systems offered by the two big clubs, customers can make an informed decision who they place their bookings with. Each have their advantages and disadvantages which members take into account when making their holiday plans.

Posted on 20/07/2017 15:16

Now, doesn't that comment completely sum up the situation?

David

oldden replied on 20/07/2017 19:06

Posted on 20/07/2017 19:06

I think they should charge £5.00 to cancel.Take it off them when they  next visit to any site. Plus Charge 50 pence when using bus passes.I only use mine when going on a pub crawl.

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook