Caravanner of the Year on BBC this April!

Did I blink and miss a frame  I only saw a partial view of one shoulder and couldn't make out either way. Then again perhaps I missed the revealing shot.

The MH was a rear lounge layout, Dave, with kitchen and washroom between that and the cab. If GC was not in the cab, he had to be on a sideways facing seat in the rear but, as DK said, it is not necessarily breaking the law which is complex. Daft, yes, but illegal, possibly.

Cheers Tinny, that explains and shows my knowledge of motorhomes 

There's no reason why you should have a knowledge of MHs, Dave. If you were thinking of buying one you'd make a point of finding out. Otherwise, why clutter the brain?

Ta, I feel much better now 

It appears that the general consensus is that we would like CG to resign, issue a public apology and be prosecuted for a seatbelt illegality. We are fortunate, considering other events around the world, that this is all have to get incensed over. Re the seatbelt issue - it would, of course, be necessary to prove that the vehicle was in motion and on a public road when that sequence was filmed.

The user and all related content has been Deleted User

Sir Bruin, you have omitted public flogging, castration, and being hung drawn and quartered; of course if he survives a Royal  pardon would then be in order .

Write your comments here...I'm sorry DD - Your suggestion is, in my opinion, taking things just a bit too far. 

K 

Sir Bruin, you have omitted public flogging, castration, and being hung drawn and quartered; of course if he survives a Royal  pardon would then be in order .

DD, I apologise for my omissions. I was concerned that I would carried away and lose my sense of proportion. :-)

I see the official line is that CC allowed the BBC to film COTY. Responsibility must, therefore, rest squarely on the shoulders of CC as it appears to have been all their idea.

 

 Even the weather presenters are choreographed these days.

Only on "Strictly"

I see the official line is that CC allowed the BBC to film COTY. Responsibility must, therefore, rest squarely on the shoulders of CC as it appears to have been all their idea.

It may have been their idea to invite the film crew TW but don’t you think that the BBC production team heavily edited the event and took the opportunity to impose their spin to show what they thought would be the most entertaining. Unfortunately they were given plenty of ammunition from the organisers and contestants.

The user and all related content has been Deleted User

I see the official line is that CC allowed the BBC to film COTY. Responsibility must, therefore, rest squarely on the shoulders of CC as it appears to have been all their idea.

It may have been their idea to invite the film crew TW but don’t you think that the BBC production team heavily edited the event and took the opportunity to impose their spin to show what they thought would be the most entertaining. Unfortunately they were given plenty of ammunition from the organisers and contestants.

I'd expect no less from the makers of a TV program, Nevers, and CC should have anticipated the same and insisted on having the final editing rights. Still, CC are proud to admit their ownership of the competition so we must all be wrong in our views of it.