COVID - general discussion - Temp Locked
1062 replies
Takethedogalong replied on 31/12/2020 17:10
Posted on 31/12/2020 16:19 by rutlandwarriorJust going by the number of posts telling people they are evil if they don't vaccinate
Posted on 31/12/2020 17:10
Hang on a bit CG🤔 I cant recall a single post from anyone using the word “evil” towards anyone who chooses not to have the vaccination. As said elsewhere, debate is healthy, but not if you choose to twist words, or ascribe incorrect terms. That’s how mis information builds.
By all means disagree, it’s your right. But saying folks are calling you evil for a different point of view isn’t factual as far as I can read on this thread?
2 people like this
Freddy55 replied on 31/12/2020 17:15
Posted on 31/12/2020 16:49 by Rocky 2 bucketsDisagreement is healthy👍🏻. No one is hurting others by not getting the vax, you get it you’re covered, others don’t-they can’t hurt those who are vax’d. Their body their choice. Masks aren’t compulsory so why should vax be🤷🏻♂️
Rocky 2 buckets replied on 31/12/2020 17:18
Posted on 31/12/2020 17:15 by Freddy55“No one is hurting others by not getting the vax, ”
And if the take up isn’t sufficient to stop the spread of the virus, with resultant further restrictions/lockdowns?
LLM replied on 31/12/2020 17:31
Posted on 31/12/2020 17:18 by Rocky 2 bucketsWe don’t know yet tbh🤷🏻♂️. I’m thinking(reading box pops) around 70/80% that’ll do nicely👍🏻😊
Rocky 2 buckets replied on 31/12/2020 17:37
Posted on 31/12/2020 17:31 by LLMI think about 60% to 70% of the population over 50 will be good 70% plus would be excellent. This should be followed by a rolling vax process for those others as they reach their 50th.
Freddy55 replied on 31/12/2020 17:38
Posted on 31/12/2020 17:18 by Rocky 2 bucketsWe don’t know yet tbh🤷🏻♂️. I’m thinking(reading box pops) around 70/80% that’ll do nicely👍🏻😊
Posted on 31/12/2020 17:38
Yes, I heard a figure of 70% mentioned. Whilst I wouldn’t want folks to be forced into having the vax, I think it’s important for those folks to understand the implications of not taking it up. I don’t know about you, but I’ve had enough of being restricted. We now have a way out, let’s grab it with both hands.
2 people like this
brue replied on 31/12/2020 18:02
Posted on 31/12/2020 16:43 by InaDI read that earlier today, brue, and I really feel for all NHS staff, it must be so disheartening. What they must have seen and dealt with, and still do, is unimaginable. Their devotion to duty, and in a lot of cases, their sacrifices, over this last year is tremendous, it's far more than just a job.
Posted on 31/12/2020 18:02
Down in the SW we're starting to take patients from Kent and London even though our numbers are rising. What shocked me in the video clip was that new Covid patients were in younger age groups and in family groups and the NHS Professor said that it wasn't the new variant that was spreading it, just the inability of people to stick to the distance and hand washing rules etc.
1 person likes this
cyberyacht replied on 31/12/2020 18:04
Posted on 31/12/2020 18:04
Part of our present dilemma is the lack of enforcement of the rules outlined for prevention of transmission. The "hands, face,space" mantra is all too often ignored and then there are the protests at the lockdowns that follow from the non-compliance. If you don't like lockdowns, keep your distance instead of thinking "it won't matter if...". It does matter. Look at today's new cases. Nearly 56,000. Tells you all you need to know.
2 people like this
mylo replied on 31/12/2020 18:19
Tinwheeler replied on 31/12/2020 18:38
Posted on 31/12/2020 18:19 by myloDoes any one know the number of patients in the new Covid hospitals think it’s called nightingale is it being used yet
This topic has been locked, no new replies can be added.
JillwithaJay
Caravanner