COVID - general discussion - Temp Locked
1062 replies
brue replied on 30/12/2020 16:39
Posted on 30/12/2020 16:20 by DavidKlyneGoing back to when the boys were young Margaret and I were taught a very harsh lesson. It was at the time of a lot of controversy about the Whooping Cough vaccine. We decided the boys shouldn't have it, I should say a decision supported by our then doctor. We came to regret that decision as both boys caught it and we had some horrible days whilst they suffered and fortunately recovered from it. So as you can imagine once bitten twice shy!
There may be some initial reluctance by some to have the vaccine, although most of the people I know can't wait for it!!! As things stand now it is the only path out of this dreadful situation we find ourselves in. As that becomes obvious to the doubters I am sure they will change their minds. You can't force someone to have a vaccine and you can't punish them if they don't. You can only hope than common sense prevails and they will see the need.
David
Posted on 30/12/2020 16:39
We did the same with one of our children David, the subsequent Whooping Cough was far worse than the skin condition that made us think she shouldn't have the vaccination. But I think there will be some who will have to opt out from the Covid vac, certainly anyone who is pregnant will have a very difficult choice, hopefully not too many in the general public will be faced with a similar difficulty but there will be some.
It's all going to take a long time, three weeks to develop immunity and 4-12 weeks between jabs, a logistical mountain.
replied on 30/12/2020 16:49
Takethedogalong replied on 30/12/2020 16:53
Posted on 30/12/2020 16:53
I sadly don’t share the optimism that the vast majority of folks who can have the vaccination, will actually have it. There have been lots of debates on Channel 4 with different groups, many of whom have put forward some not very rationale thinking behind their decision. I am sure they believe it makes sense within their peer group sphere, but it’s not always particularly well thought out or informed thinking. Very, very hard to change entrenched views, that’s where a different kind of persuasion might be necessary, for example not able to get travel insurance etc.....
Would we want to welcome hundreds of thousands of none vaccinated visitors into the UK? That’s a question to mull over. Vice versa with Brits visiting elsewhere as well? It’s a global pandemic, be great if the response could be global as well.
1 person likes this
Takethedogalong replied on 30/12/2020 17:04
Posted on 30/12/2020 16:49 byI threw in the sugestions for sanctions just as a counter to the "armed soldiers " idea for "refusniks " obviously wont happen but if it was there would be no sympathy from me.
My disabled daughter has been a virtual prisoner for 9 months and will remain so until enough people have been prevented from spreading this disease because that is what the stupidity of leaving the choice to internet experts to make up their own mind amounts too
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:04
I don’t have any issues with monetary sanctions, sometimes it can concentrate the mind into making a better informed choice.
It’s two simple jabs to save a life, get back to a degree of better living. I am certain that many in 3rd World and war torn nations, unlikely to have the opportunities we have in the next few weeks, must look on in disbelief that anyone can ponder on such a choice. Time to be thankful we are where we are.
allanandjean replied on 30/12/2020 17:15
Posted on 30/12/2020 16:19 by WherenextWhat has just struck home is the fact announced today that the interval between the 2 doses should be 12 weeks. I am unsure if the 12 weeks is set in stone but if this is the case then I can see it causing problems for people who may be away on holiday (like ME!) when the second dose needs to be administered. I'm sure there are a few on here that are planning on going abroad when that 12 week period comes around.
Conundrums abound.
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:15
As I don’t use emojis I cannot be sure if you are joking?
In the midst of discussing sanctions for people who won’t have the vaccine I can’t believe that you are suggesting a holiday may take precedence, so will presume that you aren’t.
1 person likes this
JVB66 replied on 30/12/2020 17:23
Tinwheeler replied on 30/12/2020 17:25
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:15 by allanandjeanAs I don’t use emojis I cannot be sure if you are joking?
In the midst of discussing sanctions for people who won’t have the vaccine I can’t believe that you are suggesting a holiday may take precedence, so will presume that you aren’t.
Takethedogalong replied on 30/12/2020 17:29
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:29
I don’t have any doubt WN would put health above holiday, and is joking👍😁 but it’s been patently obvious that some folks (not on here) have made what some of us might consider astoundingly selfish choices. Not least the Brits who deserted that Ski village in the last few days.
If a lot more had exercised a degree of self restraint, we might not have had the case rate and death toll this country has seen sadly.
1 person likes this
Wherenext replied on 30/12/2020 17:45
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:15 by allanandjeanAs I don’t use emojis I cannot be sure if you are joking?
In the midst of discussing sanctions for people who won’t have the vaccine I can’t believe that you are suggesting a holiday may take precedence, so will presume that you aren’t.
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:45
Not joking at all A&J. Being someone whose life expectancy would be in the low percentages if I caught the darned thing I would definitely put health first. I have for that very reason chosen not to travel abroad until I am certain that most of the population, both here and abroad will have had the vaccine. Maybe towards the end of next year, if not then 2022.
I was merely wondering what other peoples choices might be, particularly those travelling abroad.
I am still unsure if the 12 weeks mentioned is due to Oxford AstraZenica data stating that that is the most efficient gap for efficacy or if it is a pure logistical break between jabs to enable the NHS to deliver them both.
ps - just as an aside, the emoji used is not one that I normally use but is next to the "I am annoyed one" that I meant to but didn't notice until your post.
1 person likes this
Rufs replied on 30/12/2020 17:48
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:04 by TakethedogalongI don’t have any issues with monetary sanctions, sometimes it can concentrate the mind into making a better informed choice.
It’s two simple jabs to save a life, get back to a degree of better living. I am certain that many in 3rd World and war torn nations, unlikely to have the opportunities we have in the next few weeks, must look on in disbelief that anyone can ponder on such a choice. Time to be thankful we are where we are.
Posted on 30/12/2020 17:48
You should wake up and smell the coffee,
"it’s two simple jabs to save a life, get back to a degree of better living. I am certain that many in 3rd World and war torn nations, unlikely to have the opportunities we have in the next few weeks, must look on in disbelief that anyone can ponder on such a choice."
For many years people have been pondering such a choice, many years ago i did some disaster relief work in the Phillipines, Typhoid was rife, a vaccine was available but many refused it
This topic has been locked, no new replies can be added.
JillwithaJay
Caravanner