Caravan Club Non Insurance Policy
757 replies
replied on 18/11/2019 17:31
Posted on 18/11/2019 15:21 by MikeyAI'm getting dizzy!
My question to everyone is simple - " Do you think the Caravan Cover now offered (before the recent flooding limitations) is every bit as good as the CAMC Caravan Insurance previously offered to you as a customer - I am not asking is it more beneficial to the Club.
Posted on 18/11/2019 17:31
Do you think the Caravan Cover now offered (before the recent flooding limitations) is every bit as good as the CAMC Caravan Insurance previously offered to you as a customer
To me it is not. I have no concern that CAMC might renege in respect of honouring the policy. The sole reason that I will not use them is not because I distrust them. Trust is important but so are contract T&Cs The fact that this is cover unregulated by the Financial Ombudsman Service is the principle reason that I am moving away. The Contract information States that I may be able to make use of FOS via the CC's group insurance; described in a statement on the forum as being there in case CMC cannot meet financial payouts.
From previous experience of a dispute with an insurance company before the FOS was set up in around 2000 I would wish to have access to FOS directly and not rely on contract information stating that I may have access as a third party.
For me it is that simple. Each need to make their own mind up.
2 people like this
brue replied on 18/11/2019 17:58
replied on 18/11/2019 18:05
Posted on 18/11/2019 17:58 by brueAnd just to put the record straight EasyT you'll know doubt find the Financial Ombudsman Services also uses the word "may" in relation to potential users of the service...eg you "may" be able to use the services.
QED
replied on 18/11/2019 18:12
Posted on 18/11/2019 15:21 by MikeyAI'm getting dizzy!
My question to everyone is simple - " Do you think the Caravan Cover now offered (before the recent flooding limitations) is every bit as good as the CAMC Caravan Insurance previously offered to you as a customer - I am not asking is it more beneficial to the Club.
replied on 18/11/2019 18:23
Posted on 18/11/2019 17:58 by brueAnd just to put the record straight EasyT you'll know doubt find the Financial Ombudsman Services also uses the word "may" in relation to potential users of the service...eg you "may" be able to use the services.
QED
Posted on 18/11/2019 18:23
I should have asked for a link Brue as I am not sure that your post puts anything straight, let alone QED as you have not presented a case thus far .... not that you need to. Far better than you answer the poster directly if you have a view. Before you can fill in the paperwork to submit a complaint to FSO you need to endeavour to redress your complaint with your provider and following that give them eight weeks for a final response.
brue replied on 18/11/2019 19:03
Freddy55 replied on 18/11/2019 19:04
replied on 18/11/2019 19:07
Posted on 18/11/2019 19:03 by brueThere's no need to provide a link, a bit of judicious factual reading can clear the long and winding path of reality.