Caravan Club Non Insurance Policy
757 replies
EmilysDad replied on 09/11/2019 21:31
Posted on 09/11/2019 19:11 by Cornersteadyyes, and on the times my daughter called them it was very good.
Cornersteady replied on 09/11/2019 21:45
EmilysDad replied on 09/11/2019 21:53
Posted on 09/11/2019 21:45 by Cornersteadyfirstly did I actually promise? err no!
and that was in reply to another poster
Tinwheeler replied on 09/11/2019 22:06
davetommo replied on 09/11/2019 22:26
Posted on 09/11/2019 22:26
David, no insurance company pays out on 100% of claims and I fear you’re kidding yourself if you think otherwise. There’s always small print to give them an element of discretion to reject inappropriate claims. Otherwise, the company would leave themselves wide open to abuse by fraudsters.
I think may/will is a bit of a red herring here as, in reality, it’s always ‘may’.
Well said corners
1 person likes this
Tinwheeler replied on 09/11/2019 22:33
Posted on 09/11/2019 22:26 by davetommoDavid, no insurance company pays out on 100% of claims and I fear you’re kidding yourself if you think otherwise. There’s always small print to give them an element of discretion to reject inappropriate claims. Otherwise, the company would leave themselves wide open to abuse by fraudsters.
I think may/will is a bit of a red herring here as, in reality, it’s always ‘may’.
Well said corners
Cornersteady replied on 09/11/2019 22:39
Posted on 09/11/2019 22:33 by TinwheelerThat was my post but I’ll happily share your acknowledgement with Corners😊
Cornersteady replied on 09/11/2019 22:44
Posted on 09/11/2019 21:53 by EmilysDadYou implied & we hoped! And you didn't specify which post ... we hoped no more again .....
Posted on 09/11/2019 22:44
Ok first you say promise, then when challenged you say implied. Actually I didn't even imply (def: suggestion rather than explicit reference).
I was replying to DD when I stated no more, it was in a quote to him and therefore addressed and specified to him. I think you inferred it was to all but again incorrectly, as proved again by this post. All clear now?
Always happy to help
Rocky 2 buckets replied on 09/11/2019 23:29
Posted on 09/11/2019 22:44 by CornersteadyOk first you say promise, then when challenged you say implied. Actually I didn't even imply (def: suggestion rather than explicit reference).
I was replying to DD when I stated no more, it was in a quote to him and therefore addressed and specified to him. I think you inferred it was to all but again incorrectly, as proved again by this post. All clear now?
Always happy to help