1 reply
BEXIL160 replied on 28/05/2018 09:26
Posted on 28/05/2018 09:26
I think the reviewer probably needs to consider his choice of sites a bit more carefully if they wish to avoid pet owners (or Cyclists, or Children or even Bird watchers) all of whom will have chosen to stay at this site for a reason
Black Knowl is in the New Forest, a large area of countryside with open areas, wooded areas (obviously) and many cycle ways, so it rather obviously attracts dog owners and others who would enjoy this type of location.
I would take issue with a few of the reviewers other comments.
"Owners are requested to exercise their dogs off site.... this gives rise to the early morning sneaky poopers." And these two statements are linked how?
Owners are indeed requested to exercise their dogs off site, but the reviewer fails to consider that in trying to do so it is inevitable that "accidents" can occur when walking the considerable distance (for a small dog) from the far side of the site to the entrance.
"I watched a man at 6.30a.m. letting his dogs do their business in the roadway and quickly scooping it up hoping nobody had spotted him."
Then that owner is to be commended, is he not for "quickly scooping it up" ?
"Hoping nobody had spotted him". How could you possibly tell this? He'd done nothing illegal, but perhaps he was slightly embarrassed at his animals accident.
Dogs are not for everyone, or cats or children. Some owners (of dogs, cats or children) are indeed less than responsible but please try not to tar everyone with the same brush.
Follow