Ball tampering "Down Under"
32 replies
JVB66 replied on 26/03/2018 09:40
byron replied on 26/03/2018 10:19
Kennine replied on 26/03/2018 10:20
Posted on 25/03/2018 17:43 by JVB66It's because it was OZ if it had been England there would have been a much higher punishment insisted upon especialy if we had the ashes
Whittakerr replied on 26/03/2018 10:40
Posted on 25/03/2018 17:42 by KennineBall tampering has been prevalent since the advent of Cricket. No country has been immune but only recently the photographic evidence has meant that a few unfortunate teams have been caught red handed. It used to be having a pocket full of grit and rubbing it into one side of the ball which was common place. The teams are just a bit more sophisticated now.
K
Kennine replied on 26/03/2018 11:42
Posted on 26/03/2018 11:42
As said previously Ball Tampering has been prevalent over many years. England has been in the forefront of this cheating such as the case of Atherton in 1994
England captain Mike Atherton was in the crosshairs in 1994 when he was accused of ball-tampering during the Lord's Test against South Africa. --- After TV pictures appeared to show him applying dirt to the ball, Atherton insisted he had only "put some dust in my pocket from a used pitch... to keep my hands and the ball dry". --- "Aye Right" --- His defence was that, in trying to keep the moisture off the ball, he was therefore seeking to maintain its condition, rather than alter it. There are varying accounts of exactly what Atherton told match referee Peter Burge, who chose a fine rather than a ban
Punishment: Atherton fined £2,000.
So the cheats have changed the character of cricket - It happens and some are unfortunate and get caught but many others get away with it. The rules should be applied equally across the cricketing world.
K
.
Extugger