E-Scooters: I've seen it all now

JohnM20 replied on 10/12/2021 07:57

Posted on 10/12/2021 07:57

Whilst walking down the busy main corridor at the Royal Derby Hospital yesterday a guy in, I would say, his early twenties, (I'm 99% certain he wasn't staff), came out of the doors of one of the side clinics pushing an E-scooter. Once into the main corridor he promptly jumped on his scooter and proceeded to ride it, weaving through the people walking along the corridor. The corridor is not particularly wide and people are walking in both directions. Any one of them could have been hit by this idiot.

He had obviously ridden his scooter illegally to get to the hospital and then taken it in with him. Where was the hospital security? No where to be seen unfortunately.

SeasideBill replied on 19/12/2021 11:41

Posted on 19/12/2021 11:39 by vbfg

I agree that cyclists need to take responsibility for their actions, however, as an occasional cyclist, I can verify that there are SOME drivers who will deliberately make things difficult for cyclists as they refuse to make any room at traffic lights or junctions, even though they have overtaken the cyclist when approaching so are fully aware of their presence.  However, that being said, many roads in the UK are simply not safe for cyclists as they may be too narrow or the traffic, far too heavy.

Posted on 19/12/2021 11:41

I think most would accept that and it’s acknowledged in this thread. You have to question where the antipathy towards some cyclists comes from tho’?

Takethedogalong replied on 19/12/2021 11:46

Posted on 19/12/2021 11:46

2020 figures should be ignored, not a normal year. Cycling during lockdown was bliss, very few vehicles out in the first one, a lot safer to be out there. I suspect the cycling casualty figures might be up in 2021. 

I found this Which doesn’t follow your trend DD, but there are all sorts of different circumstances

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/24/cyclists-killed-on-british-roads-rose-by-40-in-2020-official-figures-show

 

Rocky 2 buckets replied on 19/12/2021 12:03

Posted on 19/12/2021 10:00 by Cornersteady

I think saying who is to blame legally or otherwise is not really the point in my view. The sad fact is that pedestrians and  cyclists will usually come off worse and who is to blame is no consolation at all for either party.

  • an average of 2 pedal cyclists died and 83 were seriously injured (adjusted) per week in reported road casualties
  • a majority of pedal cycle fatalities (59%) do not occur at or within 20m of a junction compared to 32% of all seriously injured (adjusted) casualties
  • almost half (46%) of pedal cycle fatalities in 2 vehicle accidents involved a car
  • 56% of pedal cycle fatalities occurred on rural roads compared to 29% of traffic
  • 83% of pedal cycle killed or seriously injured (KSI) casualties were male

I believe that there are just as 'many' poor drivers as there are 'poor' cyclists, it is not one or the other.

The most common contributory factor allocated to pedal cyclists in fatal or serious accidents (FSA) with another vehicle was ‘Driver or rider failed to look properly’. It was also the most common factor allocated to the other vehicles involved

In my view the new rules/laws in the code are there, or will be there, to ensure that there is greater separation and enhanced safety for all. If that means that drivers have to wait patiently to overtake and not cut cyclists off then I'm afraid that is what they will have to do. I certainly take a lot of care around cyclists knowing first hand who could happen by either party not paying enough attention. Following them, and as TDA says, knowing these rules hopefully will ensure those terrible statistics go down

Posted on 19/12/2021 12:03

Thank you C, you put it way more eloquently & factually than I did👍🏻

Takethedogalong replied on 19/12/2021 12:04

Posted on 19/12/2021 11:41 by SeasideBill

I think most would accept that and it’s acknowledged in this thread. You have to question where the antipathy towards some cyclists comes from tho’?

Posted on 19/12/2021 12:04

Who knows SB🤷‍♀️, although I suspect it  is mainly lack of understanding and patience on the part of most aggression.
I have experienced the true nastiness though, I was out with OH and some way in front of him when a sporty saloon driven by a certain demographic chose to roar at me on my side of the road. He shuddered up alongside, window down and gave me some verbal. I wasn’t polite back I admit. By which time OH had arrived, with his chum, and cowardly idiot found himself outnumbered. 

We cycle out as safely as possible, highly visible, covered in lights day and night, don’t go up the inside of vehicles, take care of pedestrians, don’t cycle on busy narrow roads, try to use cycle lanes (pathetic around us)and avoid busy times of the day. But having done all we can do, still come to grief physically and verbally.☹️

replied on 19/12/2021 12:05

Posted on 19/12/2021 12:05

Content has been removed.

dave the rave replied on 19/12/2021 12:10

Posted on 18/12/2021 21:24 by Tinwheeler

So it’s OK to hit a cyclist if you think he’s done something stupid, is it?

Posted on 19/12/2021 12:10

YES!  they need to take responsibility for their own actions!!!

Tinwheeler replied on 19/12/2021 12:53

Posted on 19/12/2021 12:10 by dave the rave

YES!  they need to take responsibility for their own actions!!!

Posted on 19/12/2021 12:53

I think your reply "Yes!" in response to my question "So it’s OK to hit a cyclist if you think he’s done something stupid, is it?" explains exactly why there is need for change in order to protect the more vulnerable road users.

I'm appalled, quite honestly, at your stance. 

Cornersteady replied on 19/12/2021 14:05

Posted on 19/12/2021 10:15 by SeasideBill
Content has been removed.

Posted on 19/12/2021 14:05

Not sure what you mean by adjusted there SB? They were taken in full and not adjusted in any way from the government website on the new changes.

Cornersteady replied on 19/12/2021 14:36

Posted on 19/12/2021 10:43 by Tinwheeler

Good factual post, Corners.

The whole point of the change in HC rules is surely to protect life and limb. How can anyone with a conscience oppose that?

Posted on 19/12/2021 14:36

You're right, why anyone is debating changes that benefit all parties is puzzling?

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook