Servicing calls at CLs for Motorcaravans

Are you allowed to say that on here, its called a fixation with inadequate wastes 

I don't recall seeing many CLs which could offer easy grey waste disposal many are often in a spot where a vehicle couldn't reach or they ask you to discharge into the undergrowth etc. We've seen quite a few septic tanks over the years where waste has to be lifted up into the container. These more awkward access spots apply to caravanners as well, water supply taps included.

As I put above, we have facility for 10 metres. Won’t help if it’s uphill though.🤔

Have you ever asked yourself why do I have to lift up the cassette to waist height?

Other sites are available.

peedee

I use them, PD👍🏻. I'm not a 'CAMC site or nothing' person.

The award winning? commercial site we normally use in Norfolk (not last year)the M/C service point is a dance to get on to, and the waste outlet needs quite a high outlet to use or a 2mtre waste hose

Because any thing lower would envolve even more compaints because of the amount of those who cannot even stop slopping it all over already .and waist height ?  not found that even on and other than either clubs cceps

I much prefer a light duty cover at ground level, remove the cover, up turn the cassette and let it just sit there whilst it empties. No chance of it falling over and discharging its contents over me. Then using a hosepipe it is very easy to flush. No need to even hold the cassette. Anything higher than knee height is asking for a disaster. 

I have used dozens of different types of CCEP over the years and I would put the CAMC design right at the top of the list of bad design.

Without doing more than reading the OP, is not the concept flawed from the start in that CLs along with similar 5 van sites are generally covered by the exemption provisions of "Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960"?

This deals with providing "camping", not enabling the running of a motorhome or caravan servicing facility. Doing as suggested would require getting LA planning Control consent for a business based on that activity.

IMO, few present 5 van sites owners operating under the provisions of the act, are going to go to the expense of getting LA authority consent. That's basically why they are presently exempted sites not licensed sites, they don't want the hassle. 

If they did it "on the quiet", firstly you would not know they did offer that if they can't admit it, and the holder of their exemption certificate, here the CMC would come down like a ton of bricks on any reported  such activity, knowing the LA would be straight onto them and so risk losing the certification.

I think it has been proposed on a "want" without any understanding the nature of these site's licensing situation.