Nose weights and A-frame length

40Kg does seem light, I tend to aim for 50 - 75 Kg personally. Of course the longer A frame should help with stability in it's own right.

The longer A frame should help stability but basically the longer the distance from the hitch to the axle the greater the vertical force at the hitch. If this distance is greater than on the previous caravan then there will be a tendency to bounce more, and if it is a problem you could try adjusting the nose weight to see if it helps, but 40 kg does seem very low. If all else fails then modifying the suspension may be the answer, but if you do that tell your insurer and advise them why.  

Actually, it's exactly the opposite. The longer the distance from the hitch to the axle, the smaller the dynamic noseweight variation. (It's easier to lift a crate with a long crowbar than with a short one).

The longer the distance from the hitch to the axle also improves sability when towing.

How's that work, the OP has found the opposite.

I get a bit tired of reading posts saying how great the European longer A frames are better, IMO all they actually do is take up more road space.

Indoors does have a point as a longer A-frame should, in theory, improve stability, although it is perhaps debatable whether an extra 50cm or maybe less in A-frame length makes a really appreciable difference. For reasons already given, the OP's arguments are flawed.

The OP was asking advice - presumably of those that have towed similar outfits rather than presenting an argument though

I am a user of very long "A" frame caravans, but both have been run at just under the 100kg limit of the chassis, and both have been impeccable towing.

The quoted 40 kgs for a 1300 MTPLM caravan jarr very much with both my ideas on "sensible" values and I though way under a German Standard. 

Lutz is our man to answer this latter point but reading the documents of my German van there appears a rule that the noseweight must not be less than 4% of the MTPLM, but never less than 25 kgs.

Four % of 1300 kgs gives a figure of 52 kgs which is 30% higher than the discussed 40 kgs, giving me cause to question the authenticity of the value quoted.

Even 52 kgs is lower than I would entertain as I am very much in the school of using as high a noseweight as the kit in use allows, to optimise stability.

Regulations governing towbar design require that they must be capable of carrying 4% of the maximum permissible towable weight as noseweight. This does not mean that the actual noseweight must be that high (although, in practice, it is always advisable to make full use the permitted noseweight limit), just that the manufacturer must document a limit at least as high as what the regulations specify.

Don't know how that works, ask the experts ( Generally German caravan manufacturers ). After owning eight Hymer brand caravans since 2001, we on returning to the Uk purchased a Coachman VIP 560/4, it was without doubt the worst caravan I have ever towed ( it lasted 3 months ). Distance between axle and rear end was IMO far too long compared with the distance between axle and hitch.

The OP doesn't mention what tow vehicle is being used, which is also critical to a safe, comfortable tow.

Regards a longer A frame taking up more road space, hows that work ?