The "other" club
120 replies
dave the rave replied on 14/01/2019 15:27
Posted on 14/01/2019 15:06 by brueWe've always belonged to both, they compliment each other, not a lot of price difference but they provide a big choice of sites and venues between them.
Tinwheeler replied on 14/01/2019 15:30
Posted on 14/01/2019 15:17 by Rufsthat is why they are known as the "Happy Club"
brue replied on 14/01/2019 15:36
Posted on 14/01/2019 15:27 by dave the raveI,as a pensioner think that the membership price difference is significant!I do agree that they both have their uses.
Cornersteady replied on 14/01/2019 15:46
moulesy replied on 14/01/2019 15:52
Posted on 14/01/2019 15:52
We've always belonged to both clubs - C&CC goes back to our tenting days. Both clubs have their advantages, belonging to both certainly gives more choice of location. On the whole I do think CAMC sites have slightly better pitches and facilities, but the other club are catching up fast as far as provision for vanners is concerned. Indeed some of their sites we've stayed on in the past couple of years are every bit as good as CAMC sites. (And yes, the age discount is a factor, though it's not a deal breaker for us! )
1 person likes this
young thomas replied on 14/01/2019 15:55
Cornersteady replied on 14/01/2019 15:57
Posted on 14/01/2019 14:06 by dave the raveand I do,(at the moment!).I am becoming very dis satified with the one I have been with the longest!
Posted on 14/01/2019 15:57
well stop using it.
When people talk of brand loyalty like this then they usually mean that they wish they the price of the long serving brand wasn't as expensive as the other product but they want to continue, why do they want to? Better something? quality? Otherwise why even say that, how long you have used something should play no part in buying another (if the only thing that has changes is price)
replied on 14/01/2019 15:58
dave the rave replied on 14/01/2019 19:01
dave the rave replied on 14/01/2019 19:02
Posted on 14/01/2019 15:57 by Cornersteadywell stop using it.
When people talk of brand loyalty like this then they usually mean that they wish they the price of the long serving brand wasn't as expensive as the other product but they want to continue, why do they want to? Better something? quality? Otherwise why even say that, how long you have used something should play no part in buying another (if the only thing that has changes is price)
dave the rave