I'm Puzzled

JohnM20 replied on 08/05/2019 12:14

Posted on 08/05/2019 12:14

My guess is that the only people to anwser this puzzle will be someone at HQ. We all know that CLs are for a maximum of five caravans / MHs but equally we all know that this number is sometimes, if not frequently, abused by some CL owners. Whilst there is always the excuse that there are 6, 7, 8 EHUs "because we need to rest the grass on some of the pitches" how does that excuse work when all the pitches are hard standings? That's the puzzle.

I'm assuming that CLs are inspected on a regular basis by club staff be this every year or two or even longer, (perhaps I'm wrong in this assumption), but surely they can count. The other assumption that must be made is that the club are actually condoning this increased use. These are the points that only the club management can answer.

Personally, an increase to six or maybe seven outfits, providing there is adequate space, is acceptable to me although I know some will shoot me down. I'd sooner a CL owner do this rather than increase site fees due to ever increasing costs, not least of which electricity, which must otherwise surely be making the viability of a CL in question. We cannot afford to keep losing them from the network.Taking an average of £15 per night, the difference between having 5 outfits or six outfits could prevent an increase increase in the cost per pitch of £2.50 per night.

Whilst commenting on space, we were on a CL described as being 1 acre. Although this CL had 7 hard-standing pitches it wasn't crowded BUT the actual pitching area was, in my estimation, only about half that. The rest of it was just a grass field. Being adjacent to a grass farm field separated only by a wire fence it didn't make the CL seem any bigger.  We have also been to a CL which was effectively a smallish clearing in a small wood but the area was given as the whole, not just the pitching area. This can be a bit misleading.

 

JohnM20 replied on 08/05/2019 15:37

Posted on 08/05/2019 15:31 by nelliethehooker

John, do you honestly think that anyone at HO are going to admit that any of their employees, or volunteers, are turning a blind eye to the sort of infringements of the law that you have highlighted in your post?

Posted on 08/05/2019 15:37

No, not at all but I just think that it might be being done. If so, they have my support so long as it is kept to minimum numbers, ie 6 or 7 outfits where space allows.

Tinwheeler replied on 08/05/2019 15:40

Posted on 08/05/2019 15:40

I wonder why you chose to publicise potential law breaking and blind eye turning when you support such actions, John. I’d have thought you'd want to hush it up.

Takethedogalong replied on 08/05/2019 15:55

Posted on 08/05/2019 15:55

Not sure if one of the CLs you mention having an extra unit on site is the one you recently reviewed, but if it is, then you need to be aware it actually offers a caravan for hire as holiday accommodation. Could this be the extra unit? Five tourers and one holiday let. 

Freddy55 replied on 08/05/2019 16:02

Posted on 08/05/2019 15:40 by Tinwheeler

I wonder why you chose to publicise potential law breaking and blind eye turning when you support such actions, John. I’d have thought you'd want to hush it up.

Posted on 08/05/2019 16:02

Yes, “I’m Puzzled “ too. 😀

CLMaddie replied on 09/05/2019 14:40

Posted on 09/05/2019 14:40

Hi JohnM20

Thank you for your post, when setting up CL sites we do not encourage more than 5 hard standing pitches, however, as mentioned by some members, some CL sites have the space to offer pitching options. Whilst we are responsible for certificating a site, there must be no more than 5 vans on the site at any one time, whatever the layout.

Our CL sites are visited by a CL Adviser every year but with a small team of volunteers it is hard for us to police the 5 van rule without the help of our Members. The CL owners are aware of the 5 van rule and that we do not under any circumstances condone exceeding the number and would ask our Members to report this to HO for investigation. Exceeding the 5 van limit can be a serious health and safety risk, as well as a breach of the exemption that allows us to certificate these sites each year.

The exempted status privilege which is regulated by Natural England, which enables us to operate CLs, comes from the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960. That privilege applies not only to our CL operation, but also to all of our temporary sites and the more than 2,500 rallies that our Centres organise across the Country every year. The fact that the Act has survived intact for 59 years is a credit to all of the Exempted Organisations, who approach their activities in such a responsible manner through their codes of conduct and the behaviour of their members.

We need to be very careful that any argument for an increase in the number of pitches on a CL is not just viewed as a back door way of getting around the site licensing regime, which is a compliance requirement for the operators of commercial sites.  Indeed, many of our members enjoy staying on CLs because they offer a more intimate experience and they would not necessarily wish to see them increasing in size. 

The Club’s focus is on doing all that we can to grow the number of CLs, not the size of individual CLs,  so that we have a balanced coverage across the country for all our members to enjoy.

Thanks

Maddie

harryb replied on 09/05/2019 15:52

Posted on 09/05/2019 15:52

“The Club’s focus is on doing all that we can to grow the number of CLs, not the size of individual CLs, so that we have a balanced coverage across the country for all our members to enjoy.”

Maddie It appears that the club are not successful in growing the number of cl’s. There are more closures than new cl’s almost every month so how can you use the words “balanced coverage” as the way things are going there will always be an imbalance.

The relevant law for the purpose of exemption is now nearly 60 years old. How many caravans were around then and more so how many members. I have made the following statement before on this forum. “In 1986 when I joined the club there were 5000 + cl’s there are now only half that.” So by upping the limit to 10 vans (if space allows) it will bring back the number of pitches to that of 33 years ago. This would be two fold. It would benefit both members and cl owners. It may stop the loss of cl's who have plenty of land to accommodate more vans. This would not be seen as “a back door way of getting around the site licensing rules” if it was done in the correct manner by the club. Outdated laws can be changed with diplomacy especially if they are of benefit. If you don't ask you don't get or perhaps, as discussed in other posts, you don't want.

Today 2500 cl’s or 12,500 pitches. At the present rate of losses how many in another 33 years. None. Food for thought.

Tinwheeler replied on 09/05/2019 16:13

Posted on 09/05/2019 16:13

I don’t think it’s for the club to push for a change in the exemption regs, Harry. If you want a change then perhaps lobbying your MP is the way forward.

Obviously, CL owners are completely free to redeem their exemption and seek permission by the usual planning methods to operate a larger site if that’s what they wish.

mickysf replied on 09/05/2019 17:52

Posted on 09/05/2019 17:52

A CL we go to has what looks like  7 hard standings however two of these are usually occupied by the owners caravan whilst their daughter stores theirs on the other. These two pitches are slightly apart from the others and closer together but I can see how some may jump to conclusions. Mind you this 'jumping' seems to be quite a regular habit for a few. 

MichaelT replied on 09/05/2019 17:58

Posted on 09/05/2019 15:52 by harryb

“The Club’s focus is on doing all that we can to grow the number of CLs, not the size of individual CLs, so that we have a balanced coverage across the country for all our members to enjoy.”

Maddie It appears that the club are not successful in growing the number of cl’s. There are more closures than new cl’s almost every month so how can you use the words “balanced coverage” as the way things are going there will always be an imbalance.

The relevant law for the purpose of exemption is now nearly 60 years old. How many caravans were around then and more so how many members. I have made the following statement before on this forum. “In 1986 when I joined the club there were 5000 + cl’s there are now only half that.” So by upping the limit to 10 vans (if space allows) it will bring back the number of pitches to that of 33 years ago. This would be two fold. It would benefit both members and cl owners. It may stop the loss of cl's who have plenty of land to accommodate more vans. This would not be seen as “a back door way of getting around the site licensing rules” if it was done in the correct manner by the club. Outdated laws can be changed with diplomacy especially if they are of benefit. If you don't ask you don't get or perhaps, as discussed in other posts, you don't want.

Today 2500 cl’s or 12,500 pitches. At the present rate of losses how many in another 33 years. None. Food for thought.

Posted on 09/05/2019 17:58

Rather than 10 vans how about a minimum of area (SQ Metres) per pitch up to 10 vans as a  lot of CL's do not have space for 5 vans comfortably let alone 10.  I can imagine if some CL's were suddenly allowed to double their income they would do so without looking at the space available?

Tinwheeler replied on 09/05/2019 18:13

Posted on 09/05/2019 18:13

There you go, MT, another idea to put to your MP.

Only the Govt can change the existing rules. 

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook