Speeding Fines

SteveL replied on 24/01/2017 10:17

Posted on 24/01/2017 10:17

I was just reading about the new proposals on the BBC web site, and although the overall intent is good, in detail they just don't seem to make sense. It is proposed that the maximum fine is increased from 100 to 150 percent of weekly income, although the upper maximum remains fixed as before. However the thing that I find odd is that someone caught doing 51 in a 30 can only be fined a maximum of £1000, whilst someone doing 101 on a motorway can be fined £2500. Clearly neither should be doing those sort of speeds, but why the disparity. 101 on a fairly empty motorway at 10 pm at night has got to be safer than 51 through a housing estate at the same time.   Whilst I appreciate it is not always possible to make laws seem totally logical, this in my opinion seems to defy logic. 

SteveL replied on 24/01/2017 16:22

Posted on 24/01/2017 15:54 by Kennine

Don't we all have Cruise control and Cruise limiting functions in our modern cars. 

Set the controls and you've no need to worry about exceeding the speed limit.  

Cheers...................K

Posted on 24/01/2017 16:22

Not exceeding the limit was not the point I was making. I was just highlighting the apparent disparity in fines for different types of speeding. Speeding is wrong.

As to using technology as you suggest. Many cars do not have it. One of ours a small automatic does not have CC. Whilst our manual tow car does, but it is not particularly effective at slower speeds. I just make sure I am aware of what speed I am doing.

Cornersteady replied on 24/01/2017 16:26

Posted on 24/01/2017 16:11 by huskydog

I don't have cruise control on my van , but a have a dial thinginy that tells me my speed (approx.), also my foot is able to lift off the throttle pedal wink

Posted on 24/01/2017 16:26

Me too. I have a large clocklike device and I make sure that pointer on it does not exceed the road's speed limit. Works rather well.

Incidentally there is  current research that suggest cruise control actually makes drivers less safe.

http://www.bbc.com/autos/story/20130808-is-cruise-control-dangerous

The less work the driver has to do, the less alert he will be behind the wheel

(sorry for the sexist language not my words)

The study indicated that by automating control of the vehicle, there is a decline in drivers’ attention and control, which reduces their ability to respond to hazards.
 
For example, when cruise control and speed limiters were used, drivers showed reduced ability to merge into traffic due to greater difficulty in modulating vehicle speed. The aids also caused drivers to remain in the overtaking lane for longer periods of time and to move back into the slow lane less often. Drivers straightened their vehicles less often when using these devices, and had substantially slower reaction times, especially in emergencies.
 
These behaviours grew more pronounced with the duration of travel, especially when using cruise control. Generally, the reduction of alertness and control was greater when using cruise control than with speed limiters, the researchers said

Any comments?

Speed limiters for all cars then? (I am not suggesting this just throwing it open for discussion)

Rocky 2 buckets replied on 24/01/2017 16:40

Posted on 24/01/2017 16:40

Interesting thread SLsmile, I'm with Corners on the 20mph on all urban roads. Speeding is speeding, it WILL take life at some point due to the reaction times. As much as I 'get' the disparity point I do think it can be too complicated as in-if on a quiet road in the wee small hours it should be classed differently. Big fine to start with re exceeding accepted speed, then Doubling & tripling etc after that. It needs to hit everyone hard.

dmiller555 replied on 24/01/2017 16:40

Posted on 24/01/2017 16:40

The prime objective with this sort of change is to allow a jobsworth somewhere to tick a box and claim that they have fixed a problem, which they haven't.

Without providing sufficient resources to catch, prosecute and punish at least the majority of offenders the status quo prevails but it looks good in someone's annual report. 

 

mickysf replied on 24/01/2017 18:33

Posted on 24/01/2017 18:33

It would be impossible to monitor the speeds on all roads and all road users on a regular basis. Fines should be higher for repeat offenders and significantly higher for truely excessive speeds. It's just a shame that deterents have to be used rather than folk respecting the laws of our land and the lives and health of other people. It's all to easy to inadvertently creep about the road speed, I know that to my expence, thankfully my Nav system shouts at me when I do, I just wish it was a little more reliable and quick to alert me particularly when I'm in unfamiliar territory.

EmilysDad replied on 24/01/2017 18:54

Posted on 24/01/2017 18:54

So it seems that you can drive as dangerously as you like  just as long as you don't exceed  the (sometimes ) arbitrary  speed limit .... a bit like the clown in front of me earlier today .... swapped lanes half a dozen times (dual carriageway) cutting people up, but eventually ended up one car in front.

Cornersteady replied on 24/01/2017 19:12

Posted on 24/01/2017 19:12

I don't think anyone has said that MM? We're just talking about  exceeding the speed limit. If you drive dangerously you could get convicted of dangerous driving, there's also careless driving, inconsiderate driving, driving without due care and attention. Of course you have to get caught first and unless there was a police car about in the situation you describe it is unlikely, so it's probably easier to get caught for speeding with all the speed cameras.

 

Cornersteady replied on 24/01/2017 19:14

Posted on 24/01/2017 19:14

Hey, this thread appears in the ask the expert section. I've been promoted at last!

Post edit, it appears in the CT homepage of discussions under Ask the expert but actually in it. Oh at least I had one minute of fame 

Tinwheeler replied on 24/01/2017 19:23

Posted on 24/01/2017 19:14 by Cornersteady

Hey, this thread appears in the ask the expert section. I've been promoted at last!

Post edit, it appears in the CT homepage of discussions under Ask the expert but actually in it. Oh at least I had one minute of fame 

Posted on 24/01/2017 19:23

Every new post takes the thread into Ask the Expert, Corners. This will be there now until someone else posts. Good, eh? undecided

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook