tigerfish replied on 02/12/2016 09:04
Posted on 02/12/2016 09:04
We heard yesterday that there were dangerous levels of pollution in our cities. The inference was that it was all our fault because we were using our cars, bus's and HGV's too much, and I accept that that may well be the cause.
BUT, back in the 1950's when I were nowt but a lad, at about this time of the year we experienced Smog! Fog so thick that you literally could not see your hand infront of your face. Breathing was difficult, and it actually smelt of a sulfery tarry choking mess. I suppose it came from steam engines, factories and millions of coal fired house fires.
So how did that sort of pollution compare with today's? Was it worse or just different? This is not meant to be provocative, I genuinely don't know and it interests me!
My personal opinion tends towards thinking that bad as our inner cities may be, they are not as bad as they were in the 50's,- but on the other hand could it be that todays pollution may be invisible, but is perhaps more dangerous???
TF
tigerfish
Motorhomer