Satnav use in the new driving test
46 replies
Steve Scott replied on 15/04/2017 13:40
DSB replied on 15/04/2017 14:25
Posted on 15/04/2017 09:24 by SteveLIt is unclear what sort of parking bay they mean. Ones on the side of the road, or a supermarket type one. However, including both types would be good. Parking in supermarkets is often atrocious, resulting in the loss of a bay, which at busy times is just antisocial. What is so difficult in getting it between the lines?🤔
Posted on 15/04/2017 14:25
I wouldn't mind betting that some of it is intentional. If you have a large car e.g. a Discovery, some of the spaces are hardly big enough. I'm sure some park in between to avoid their car being bashed by other car doors.
I'm fortunate (or unfortunate, depending on how you view it) as I have a disabled badge and can use larger spaces. Just take a look at how many folk park badly in disabled spaces. I'm guessing next to none.
David
DSB replied on 15/04/2017 14:32
Navigateur replied on 15/04/2017 14:58
Posted on 15/04/2017 14:58
It is just dumbing down the test to what those who expect driving to be a right and not a privilege are able to do.
Without the three-point-turn and reverse-round-corner there will be no reversing in the test at all. So there will be drivers who expect never to reverse - and that is how they will drive. Only park in the car-park when there are two vacant bays in-line and they can drive through; no turning back even when the sat-nav tells them to turn round.
Navigating with a map is not about looking at the map all the time. It is about working out the route and committing it to memory by using the brain. Turning the map around is a clear sign of no spatial awareness, which is where doing nothing but responding to instructions from an electronic voice takes one as well.
Bring on the driverless cars as that is where this is taking us!
trellis replied on 15/04/2017 15:03
IanH replied on 15/04/2017 15:37
IanH replied on 15/04/2017 15:40
Posted on 15/04/2017 14:58 by NavigateurIt is just dumbing down the test to what those who expect driving to be a right and not a privilege are able to do.
Without the three-point-turn and reverse-round-corner there will be no reversing in the test at all. So there will be drivers who expect never to reverse - and that is how they will drive. Only park in the car-park when there are two vacant bays in-line and they can drive through; no turning back even when the sat-nav tells them to turn round.
Navigating with a map is not about looking at the map all the time. It is about working out the route and committing it to memory by using the brain. Turning the map around is a clear sign of no spatial awareness, which is where doing nothing but responding to instructions from an electronic voice takes one as well.
Bring on the driverless cars as that is where this is taking us!
Posted on 15/04/2017 15:40
Agreed.
Driving instructors usually teach people how to pass their test (not how to drive) and if there is no reversing in in the test, they will never be taught how to reverse.
We can probably expect more dings on our cars, caused by people who cannot control their vehicle (but are very good at doing what a sat nav tells them to do).
1 person likes this
IanH replied on 15/04/2017 15:41
ABM replied on 15/04/2017 16:19
Posted on 15/04/2017 16:19
As a non- sat nav user a thought just came bubbling up !!
Will the Relevant Testing Authority have a list of "Preferred" sat navs to be used in the test ??
The reason I ask is, I have seen the videos of vehicles going into too narrow roads, towards low bridges, and, on one occasion, half way { !! } through a ford. Now should this happen using the approved kit, will they be liable as in " Well, you told me to use it"
P.S. / Edit :-- will the SatNav become a compulsory part of the vehicle that you are in ??
brue
Motorhomer