Posted on 04/08/2022 11:38
Just laughing at some reviews of sites that we have booked. The righteous indignation of those who agree with the club rules as long as they don't apply to themselves.
Moderator Edit:
Title amended to better reflect the topic of the thread.
3 people like this
Posted on 05/08/2022 21:20 by TakethedogalongGrayjames said So just thinking of two recent examples, one from last year and one earlier this year, I was highly praiseworthy of a site manager at Ayr who was lovely, friendly, helpful and always up for a chat. On the other hand, at White Water I found a lady site manager to be cold, unsmiling and inhospitable [and very far from chatty] and so I said so in my review. Are people suggesting that is not valid in a site review? If so, I fundamentally disagree.
Sorry GJ, such information is irrelevant for me. Just your perceptions. None of us could know why someone didn’t meet your required facial expression or chat level. The individual concerned could be unwell, have heard bad news, have been on duty during a bad incident, anything🤷♀️They are human beings, just like the customers they serve, but don’t have recourse to saying anything about some of the demanding, inconsiderate, rude, selfish, maybe at times abusive people they have to meet and greet. And what’s the relevance of the “lady” tag? Tells me nothing about either Ayr or WWP🤷♀️
Posted on 05/08/2022 16:19 by Surfer
Moderator Edit:
As per T & Cs, if you have any issue with moderation, please contact the Community Manager directly.
Posted on 06/08/2022 08:11
It’s under community guidelines
useful info list right hand side of page
Frank Gill
Caravanner