Steamer Quay refurb removal of non EHU pitches

Hja replied on 20/12/2022 21:41

Posted on 20/12/2022 21:41

Just had my copy of the December magazine and noticed that the economy pitches are to be removed at Steamer Quay as part of the refurbishment.  As I understand it, these are the non-EHU pitches.  Isnt this somewhat short sighted in the current climate?  Surely more will be using off grid as a way of saving money?  We certainly will be next year.  Maybe there is some special issue at this site?  I havnt stayed there, just noticed it in the magazine. 

 

Comment from the Community Team

Due to a number of posts going off topic and numerous reports about posts that contravened the Community Guidelines we have closed this discussion pending review. Thank you to all our members who have commented in a positive and helpful manner and for member's who have provided us with constructive feedback. 

DavidKlyne replied on 29/12/2022 13:27

Posted on 29/12/2022 13:27

I wonder if some of the pros and cons of this discussion have a generational aspect to them. Anyone over, say, 60 and has been camping for some years will no doubt remember sites that were much more basic than they are today. Predominately grass pitches, often not all pitches with EHU. Those under 60 are likely to have experience a  different type of campsite. All pitches with EHU, a majority of hardstandings and a proportion of those serviced. The age chosen was arbitrary, it could be 50,55,65 but you get the idea. It is rather ironic that all the posts I see on Facebook asking for CL recommendations seem to demand EHU, hardstandings and toilets as a minimum requirement, don't recall seeing many requests for CL's with no facilities and grass pitches! It could be the latter is what people imagine CL's to be. So in the same way people who have grown up more recently with camping as their holiday choice demand more than those that have been doing it for longer?

David

Tinwheeler replied on 29/12/2022 13:34

Posted on 29/12/2022 13:27 by DavidKlyne

I wonder if some of the pros and cons of this discussion have a generational aspect to them. Anyone over, say, 60 and has been camping for some years will no doubt remember sites that were much more basic than they are today. Predominately grass pitches, often not all pitches with EHU. Those under 60 are likely to have experience a  different type of campsite. All pitches with EHU, a majority of hardstandings and a proportion of those serviced. The age chosen was arbitrary, it could be 50,55,65 but you get the idea. It is rather ironic that all the posts I see on Facebook asking for CL recommendations seem to demand EHU, hardstandings and toilets as a minimum requirement, don't recall seeing many requests for CL's with no facilities and grass pitches! It could be the latter is what people imagine CL's to be. So in the same way people who have grown up more recently with camping as their holiday choice demand more than those that have been doing it for longer?

David

Posted on 29/12/2022 13:34

I don’t think the age thing necessarily follows, David.

Corners and BB will be approximately the same age - chalk and cheese in respect of their site requirements.

Hja replied on 29/12/2022 13:42

Posted on 29/12/2022 13:27 by DavidKlyne

I wonder if some of the pros and cons of this discussion have a generational aspect to them. Anyone over, say, 60 and has been camping for some years will no doubt remember sites that were much more basic than they are today. Predominately grass pitches, often not all pitches with EHU. Those under 60 are likely to have experience a  different type of campsite. All pitches with EHU, a majority of hardstandings and a proportion of those serviced. The age chosen was arbitrary, it could be 50,55,65 but you get the idea. It is rather ironic that all the posts I see on Facebook asking for CL recommendations seem to demand EHU, hardstandings and toilets as a minimum requirement, don't recall seeing many requests for CL's with no facilities and grass pitches! It could be the latter is what people imagine CL's to be. So in the same way people who have grown up more recently with camping as their holiday choice demand more than those that have been doing it for longer?

David

Posted on 29/12/2022 13:42

I think that those newer to camping do, at least initially, expect more. And I guess the apparent increased popularity of small pop top camper vans also leads to wanting shower blocks.

With CLs I think there has been some increase in popularity from people new to CLs and so they are expecting mini sites. It really is a shame that the Club doesn’t cherish its CL network and have more articles in the mag and info on the web site really explaining CLs. I think some are scared of no facility sites. They probably wouldn’t use the no toilet block Club sites.

As for SQ by removing all non ehu pitches they are removing a facility that was used. Those members now have less choice. I would have thought that all pitches being no awning was going to reduce the likelihood of families staying for about a week or more. Certainly when we caravanned with family if we were parked up for a week we wanted the full awning just to spread out, dry washing, store chairs etc. The Club has the opportunity to do something innovative at SQ by either metering ALL electricity use or by enabling the bollard to be switched on or off. Will they show that imagination? I doubt it.

Takethedogalong replied on 29/12/2022 14:15

Posted on 29/12/2022 14:15

 Lot of sense in last few posts. Certainly we started when sites and outfits were basic, and having learned all the eco tricks, the ability to “make do because it’s camping”, we are still very happy on basic sites. Helped by not owning a power hungry outfit, that we have hardly modified.

I can empathise with those who want more comfort as well, and who want an easy life nowadays camping, happy to pay whatever is asked. Outside of CLs, this is very much becoming the Club model. Doesn’t give us as much choice, but we look beyond the Club Site model in most instances.

It would be very hard to define a typical camper, too many variables at play. I think Club has an idea of its main users, and caters accordingly.

brue replied on 29/12/2022 14:50

Posted on 29/12/2022 13:27 by DavidKlyne

I wonder if some of the pros and cons of this discussion have a generational aspect to them. Anyone over, say, 60 and has been camping for some years will no doubt remember sites that were much more basic than they are today. Predominately grass pitches, often not all pitches with EHU. Those under 60 are likely to have experience a  different type of campsite. All pitches with EHU, a majority of hardstandings and a proportion of those serviced. The age chosen was arbitrary, it could be 50,55,65 but you get the idea. It is rather ironic that all the posts I see on Facebook asking for CL recommendations seem to demand EHU, hardstandings and toilets as a minimum requirement, don't recall seeing many requests for CL's with no facilities and grass pitches! It could be the latter is what people imagine CL's to be. So in the same way people who have grown up more recently with camping as their holiday choice demand more than those that have been doing it for longer?

David

Posted on 29/12/2022 14:50

Interestingly, and speaking for ourselves, over the last year or so we have drifted away from CAMC offerings, one of the nice things about Steamer Quay is that the grass pitches and "camping" style (although with wash block facilities there as back up) have attracted younger families and people enjoying a more laid back holiday style, often with a VW and an awning, plus boating people with canoes etc. Lots of bikes and walkers too.

I don't know the age of people on your FB group David but I suspect they are older and may not be interested in getting back to basics but a lot of people out there still enjoy the simple life style that other camp sites provide. You don't see this group of people on CAMC sites as the offerings are very limited but you see it on other sites.

I'm guessing CAMC is finding it easier to standardise every site and those not wanting or needing this will drift off elsewhere as we have now tended to do. 

peedee replied on 29/12/2022 15:22

Posted on 29/12/2022 15:22

2014 was the last time I spent the majority of nights away on C&MC sites. From 2015 onwards they have not been top of my list of go to places and I have spent more time on other types of sites. Last year only 14 pecent (11 nights) of my nights away were spent on C&MC sites.  I don't see it getting any better in 2023 in fact as I will be back to touring on the Continent it could be very much worse. Price rises are making it harder to justify paying for facilities I do not need, therefore the up grade of SQ is unlikely to prove attractive especially for short stays.

peedee

This topic has been locked, no new replies can be added.

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook