CL Reviews - an anomaly

Have noticed that too, WN. I do wonder however how many bother to read all the reviews, and only stick to the 3 that are showing on the site's page.

I like to read all the reviews, you can normally find out more that way than just from reading a few

Have noticed that too, WN. I do wonder however how many bother to read all the reviews, and only stick to the 3 that are showing on the site's page.

Write your comments here... Hi, NTH. I always read the full reviews. Tend to discard any that are quite old if there are a few more recent ones but you never know what nugget you might pick up from an older review.

I try and read through all the reviews from the past 2 years, but ignore ones before that, even if they do appear on the first page.

Yes I have noticed that as well, as you say another quirk of the CC.

I always look at all the reviews for CL sites not just the last three but it is unusual to find a very negative one.

It's not just CL reviews, it's the same for the main site reviews; comments able to be left for the "top 3" only 

For a good all round view of CLs, read reviews on UKcampsites as well. Not all CLs are covered of course, but a good few certainly are.