Motorhome berths vs seat belts
26 replies
Tinwheeler replied on 02/01/2018 21:06
Posted on 02/01/2018 20:06 by rich 81Hi
It is an observation as I may change to a motorhome and that's why I was looking at them. I didn't claim it to be anything other than that. Ordering a new BMW would have no bearing on weather I buy a motorhome or not. I will use the car far more solo than for towing
Posted on 02/01/2018 21:06
I know you claimed nothing, Rich, but people have made assumptions that you’re changing units. You refer to using the BMW as a tow car in your other post so I concluded, correctly, that an imminent change is not on the cards.
Whatever, your knowledge of MHs has now been enhanced.
young thomas replied on 03/01/2018 07:24
Posted on 02/01/2018 20:06 by rich 81Hi
It is an observation as I may change to a motorhome and that's why I was looking at them. I didn't claim it to be anything other than that. Ordering a new BMW would have no bearing on weather I buy a motorhome or not. I will use the car far more solo than for towing
Hallsontour replied on 06/01/2018 10:47
Posted on 06/01/2018 10:47
Whilst agreeing with all the previous posts, especially regarding payload, if you need extra full forward seating with belts Elddis have a great solution. They have 'fold away' aircraft type seats under the two front bench seats. My daughter says they are comfortable.
Arrivakids replied on 25/02/2018 21:09
Paolo Imberino replied on 25/02/2018 21:34
peegeenine replied on 26/02/2018 14:20
Posted on 26/02/2018 14:20
Although side facing seats do not require seat belts it would be very unwise to travel on one. Indeed it would be unwise to travel on one wearing seat belts too, which may be found on older vehicles.
As I understand, the current seat belt regs refer to designated travel seats that must be fitted with seat belts. Side facing seats are not designated for travel and it could be argued that the driver is carrying passengers dangerously. This may lead to a conviction and insurance deemed to be invalid.
For the past 8 years my insurance company has asked how many seat belts are fitted to my MH so there is no escaping how many passengers I can carry.
Tinwheeler replied on 26/02/2018 15:05
Posted on 26/02/2018 14:20 by peegeenineAlthough side facing seats do not require seat belts it would be very unwise to travel on one. Indeed it would be unwise to travel on one wearing seat belts too, which may be found on older vehicles.
As I understand, the current seat belt regs refer to designated travel seats that must be fitted with seat belts. Side facing seats are not designated for travel and it could be argued that the driver is carrying passengers dangerously. This may lead to a conviction and insurance deemed to be invalid.
For the past 8 years my insurance company has asked how many seat belts are fitted to my MH so there is no escaping how many passengers I can carry.
Posted on 26/02/2018 15:05
Which brings us back to my comment on page 1 about the law being a minefield in that respect.
Just to illustrate the safety issue, some years ago there was a case in the Westcountry where a local vet was in the rear of his MH sat at a table doing paper work while someone else drove. The window beside him fell out and the force of the draught sucked him out into the road. He was lucky but it could easily have been fatal.
ABM replied on 26/02/2018 15:36
Paolo Imberino replied on 26/02/2018 16:12
Posted on 26/02/2018 16:12
Having 28 years in the insurance game and qualified up to the hilt the insurance company cannot overrule the law of the land. The law is not grey but clearly black and white. You can travel unbelted in the back of a motorhome with side facing seats.
Naturally I question the safty aspect but that's up to the individul and driver. I have parallel seats and I would not entertain anyone travelling unbelted.
Tinwheeler replied on 26/02/2018 16:14
Posted on 26/02/2018 15:36 by ABMBy 'eck, TW What speed were they travelling at ?? You never got that effect in a Puss Moth !!
rich 81
Caravanner