So what did the Club ever do for Motorcaravanners?

StuartO replied on 02/03/2019 12:44

Posted on 02/03/2019 12:44

It’s a while now since the Club was renamed, to reflect that there are lots of motorhomers among Members - but apart from the name change, what has and does the Club plan to do to cater effectively for motorhomers?

Well there has been a programme of improving motorhome servicepoints, to provide drive-over grey water drains, but at the club Site I most recently stayed at there was no lighting at this service point (unlike the others) so using it after dark (and it was dark at 4.30pm that day) was a matter of struggling with a torch.  But I haven’t noticed anything else specifically for motorhomers and in response a suggestion that the Club should develop overnight parking stops for motorhome like the Aires on the continent, I read somewhere that the Club’s only response was to wonder whether a discussion about whether this was a more appropriate thing for the Government rather than the Clubs to be considering.

CAMC is of course a commercial operator of full scale caravan sites and jolly good they are too but these cater primarily for people who want to stay for quite a number of days, like caravanners do, while lots of motorhomers (certainly on the Continent) make lots of use of more basic overnight parking, to stay for one or two nights only and then move on.  Some motorhomers do use their vehicles like caravans and stay on a Site for a while but lots more enjoys their holidays by keeping moving along.

For holidaying in this mode motorhomers don’t need a toilet block, resident staff and manicured grass around them every night; on most nights they don’t need much more than parking, a supply of drinking water, a drain for grey water and somewhere to empty the chemical toilet.  CAMC should be just as capable of building good Night Halt locations as it is at building full scale caravan sites - and operating them profitably.  There are lots of Aires on the continent which charge good money (and use barrier entry operated with credit cards etc) as well as the free ones provided (as a tourist facility and an attraction) by many local authorities.

There may be an argument for local authorities to build Aires as tourist attractions etc but there is also, quite separately, an argument for CAMC showing initiative in building a network of Aires in UK as a service to it’s Motorhome Members.  I think a network of CAMC Motorhome Nightstops would compliment the network of Club Sites and serve to promote them too - for example each Night Halt could easily display advertising material about nearby Club Sites.  And motorhomers who use Aires also tend to use full scale caravan sites periodically as well, for example to have a ‘laundry day”.

Isn’t someone on the Club’s staff or committees already thinking about this avenue of development - and if so can we hear something about their ideas?

 

JollyKernow replied on 20/03/2019 07:32

Posted on 19/03/2019 22:36 by

No it wasn't Micky and a cheeky wink doesn't alter, your repeated   homilies to a limited travel company that trades very successfully on a "club status" among its devoted followers or "members"wink

Posted on 20/03/2019 07:32

All 365000 of themwinkwink

replied on 20/03/2019 07:45

Posted on 20/03/2019 07:32 by JollyKernow

All 365000 of themwinkwink

Posted on 20/03/2019 07:45

The user and all related content has been Deleted User

replied on 20/03/2019 07:57

Posted on 20/03/2019 07:57

That's undeniable but the reverse is true too , someone wanting a long stay has problems getting a pitch because of short bookings in the middle of thier projected stay as is frequently mentioned on here in relation to weekends.

I cannot see how individual pitch bookings would assist the long stayer. He needs the same pitch available for a full week. Not moving part way through to fit in with pre-existing pitch bookings.

I am only describing a system that does seem to work and widly adopted by commercial operators who presumably don't loose by it but of course won't happen on club sites.
 

Some sites do offer that but on a number it is one week bookings, 2 or 3 day bookings at weekend and 4 days in the week. 

JVB66 replied on 20/03/2019 08:16

Posted on 20/03/2019 07:27 by

That's undeniable  but the reverse is true too , someone wanting a long stay has problems getting a pitch because of short bookings in the middle of thier projected stay as is frequently mentioned on here in relation to weekends.

I am only describing a system that does seem to work and widly adopted by commercial operators who presumably don't loose by it but of course won't happen on club sites.

Posted on 20/03/2019 08:16

Hopefully not , the system works now as in the past , for what seems the majority of members and as a "democratic"society thats how it works

mickysf replied on 20/03/2019 08:53

Posted on 20/03/2019 07:57 by

That's undeniable but the reverse is true too , someone wanting a long stay has problems getting a pitch because of short bookings in the middle of thier projected stay as is frequently mentioned on here in relation to weekends.

I cannot see how individual pitch bookings would assist the long stayer. He needs the same pitch available for a full week. Not moving part way through to fit in with pre-existing pitch bookings.

I am only describing a system that does seem to work and widly adopted by commercial operators who presumably don't loose by it but of course won't happen on club sites.
 

Some sites do offer that but on a number it is one week bookings, 2 or 3 day bookings at weekend and 4 days in the week. 

Posted on 20/03/2019 08:53

Agreed. Having different providers offering different systems is a good thing isn't it. The club's system works and has worked for decades for its 'membership', call it what you will, that private site's system works for them so why change. I really believe that having different providers offering different 'products' is beneficial as we can pick and choose as best fits our needs. I choose to join the club because their product and it's network works for me, it also works for many others judging by the numbers of 'subscribers' .

Cornersteady replied on 20/03/2019 08:59

Posted on 20/03/2019 08:53 by mickysf

Agreed. Having different providers offering different systems is a good thing isn't it. The club's system works and has worked for decades for its 'membership', call it what you will, that private site's system works for them so why change. I really believe that having different providers offering different 'products' is beneficial as we can pick and choose as best fits our needs. I choose to join the club because their product and it's network works for me, it also works for many others judging by the numbers of 'subscribers' .

Posted on 20/03/2019 08:59

+1

Takethedogalong replied on 20/03/2019 10:55

Posted on 20/03/2019 10:55

I only said it would work for us, but I can understand why it might prove difficult on some Club Sites, which are way too busy. It’s actually one of the reasons why we prefer CLs and less busy sites.

If we take the caravan, and stop a while, say a week, on one site, we hope to get a pitch that gives us our prime requirements, namely privacy, quiet and room to stretch out a little. Few pitches, on a tiny number of Club Sites come anywhere near to offering this. Possible in Winter, on more. We have never enjoyed folks walking or driving past looking in, we like to sit outside and have a nice meal, all times of day when the weather is dry. So we use CLs that give us these requirements. And sometimes let us have the pitch of our dreams.....😁

 

Rab replied on 29/03/2019 20:40

Posted on 29/03/2019 20:40

lets go back to the origonal statement "what did the Caravan Club do for motorhomes", well they let something that is not a caravan onto there "caravan sites",where would yous be if the wardens had said  you cant come in here thats not a caravan.So thats that question answered and i dont have a problem with motorhomes and caravans sharing our wonderful sites it seems to work with no apparent problems.But the idea of building glorified layby,s is a non starter as the cost of the whole concept would be a dead loss in money terms, so i wont be supporting that idea.

SteveL replied on 30/03/2019 10:44

Posted on 29/03/2019 20:40 by Rab

lets go back to the origonal statement "what did the Caravan Club do for motorhomes", well they let something that is not a caravan onto there "caravan sites",where would yous be if the wardens had said  you cant come in here thats not a caravan.So thats that question answered and i dont have a problem with motorhomes and caravans sharing our wonderful sites it seems to work with no apparent problems.But the idea of building glorified layby,s is a non starter as the cost of the whole concept would be a dead loss in money terms, so i wont be supporting that idea.

Posted on 30/03/2019 10:44

I am afraid you are incorrect.

We have just acquired a MH and recently received the V5. Therefore I can confirm what JVB has mentioned before. Under D5 body type it says it is a Motor Caravan.

near Malvern Hills Club Campsite Member photo by Andrew Cole

Book a late escape

There's still availability at many popular UK Club campsites - find your perfect pitch today for a last minute trip!

Book now
Woman sitting in camping chair by Wastwater in the Lake District with her two dogs and picnic blanket

Follow us on Facebook

Follow the Caravan and Motorhome Club via our official Facebook page for latest news, holiday ideas, events, activities and special offers.

Photo of Wast Water, Lake District by Sue Peace
Visit Facebook