Services That We Don't Receive

I've no doubt you're right, Countax, and your ideas are sound.

Sadly, I fear an organisation which believes its members want to cavort in a ridiculous televised 'competition' isn't likely to see the sense in your suggestion but why not try lobbying senior management?

I would also agree. However, given they have taken 9 months and counting, to report on the reliability survey, supposedly due to the analysis invoved. I would have to question if they have the resources.

The first one would be easy enough because of the very limited number of makes available. The second is far more difficult as there are numerous suppliers and you could never cover more than a small sample.

The problem though with comparing guarantees is not only do you need to look at the wording but the implementation.

I would also agree. However, given they have taken 9 months and counting, to report on the reliability survey, supposedly due to the analysis invoved. I would have to question if they have the resources.

Or in the interest in doing it.....

I notice the Practical Caravan survey is now being supported by the C&CC.

Why should the CC bite the hand that feeds (advertising)  while we the members pay continue to pay it millions in fees every year.  Obviously they like the status quo

Why should the CC bite the hand that feeds (advertising)  while we the members pay continue to pay it millions in fees every year.  Obviously they like the status quo

Practical caravan prints the results of their survey warts and all and it does not seem to affect their advertising so it will not worry the club.  From memory not all advertise anyway so there is nothing to worry about from those.

If the club were worried about the results they would not have done rhe survey as the PC survey told them exactly what to expect.

I think the club could do a lot more for members but there are too many chums at the top who are close to the industry so nothing will change